SmartPlantIQ brings AI decision support to GxP manufacturing — PAT soft sensors that predict quality attributes between offline assays, deviation triage that cites your SOPs, and batch-record narratives written from live process data. Advisory-only by design: it never actuates your process.
Moisture, titre and potency are known only when the lab reports. Between samples, operators steer on experience — and drift is discovered after the fact.
Every excursion means exporting historian trends, reconciling alarms and hand-writing the rationale — repeated for every batch, on every shift.
A recommendation you cannot trace to data and an SOP is unusable in a GxP area. Explainability is not a nice-to-have — it is the entry ticket.
Soft sensors model a critical quality attribute from the process tags you already record — giving a continuous predicted value between offline assays, with drift monitoring against every new lab result.
Predicted from bed temperature, inlet air and airflow — see the drying end-point approach instead of waiting for the next LOD assay.
Predicted from agitation, DO and pH across the fed-batch campaign — an early read on whether the batch is tracking its golden profile.
Predictions support decisions; batch disposition and release always use the validated laboratory assay. Every model records its features, coefficients, training window and residual sigma for change control.
See it on the live bioreactorAsk in plain language. The copilot pulls the live tags, checks the CPP bands in your SOP, distinguishes a genuine excursion from normal batch physiology, and hands you the documented rationale.
Not a deviation (currently). DO is declining but within the expected, controlled band — normal fed-batch behaviour per SOP-BR-201.
Evidence: DO 42.4% → 38.3% over 48 h; no anomaly windows or stuck-instrument flags; DO inversely correlated with agitator speed (r = −0.53), which climbed 178 → 197 rpm — exactly the cascade the SOP describes for rising oxygen uptake. Temperature and pH both in band.
Escalate only if DO < 30% sustained > 15 min, or temperature/pH leave their bands. None breached — no deviation triggered.
One tap groups active alarms by likely common cause, ranks the actionable one first, and names the alarms that can be deprioritised — with the chattering tags flagged for rationalisation review.
Shift handover and daily briefings written from live data: excursions with timestamps, alarms, watch items and actions — a drafted starting point for the batch-record narrative, not a blank page.
Compare the running campaign against historical profiles to see divergence while the batch is still in progress.
SmartPlantIQ is decision-support software. It does not write to your control system, and it is architected so that every answer it gives can be traced, reviewed and retained.
No setpoint writes, no closed-loop control, no actuation — a materially lighter validation burden than control software.
Every finding cites the tags, values and time windows behind it, plus the SOP it references. Nothing is asserted without its evidence.
Every question and answer is recorded with user and timestamp; role-based access separates viewer, engineer and administrator rights.
Runs inside your network alongside your historian — process and batch data never has to leave the site.
On qualification: SmartPlantIQ provides the technical controls above — audit trails, access control, electronic records, model change control and traceable outputs — to support your computerised-system validation and data-integrity (ALCOA+) programme. Qualification of the system in your environment (IQ/OQ/PQ) is performed jointly with your quality unit as part of a pilot. We do not claim certification on your behalf.
Start from CSV exports of one unit — no control-system integration, no firewall changes. We build the asset model and agree the success metric with your team.
We train the PAT model against your lab history, stand the copilot up on your SOPs, and run it alongside the shift — advisory, in parallel with existing practice.
Review prediction accuracy against lab, time-to-triage against baseline, and the deviation record — then decide on rollout with your quality unit.